Country policies Sub Indicator
Teaching - Teacher Content Knowledge - Policy Lever (Teaching) - Evaluation
This chart presents the de facto score for this policy lever for all GEPD participating countries. For more information on the various components of this indicator, please refer to the detailed sub-indicator page.
Sub-Indicator | Overall |
---|---|
(De Jure) There are clear consequences for teachers who receive two or more positive evaluations | 1 |
(De Jure) There are clear consequences for teachers who receive two or more negative evaluations | 1 |
(De Jure) The criteria to evaluate teachers is clear | 3 |
(De Jure) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Evaluation | 4.8 |
(De Jure) Legislation assigns responsibility of evaluating the performance of teachers to the schools | 1 |
(De Jure) Legislation assigns responsibility of evaluating the performance of teachers to a public authority (national, regional, local) | 0 |
(De Facto) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Evaluation | 3.6 |
(De Facto) Percent of teachers that report there would be consequences after two positive evaluations | 77.7 |
(De Facto) Percent of teachers that report there would be consequences after two negative evaluations | 79.9 |
(De Facto) Percent of teachers that report being evaluated in the past 12 months | 61.2 |
(De Facto) Number of criteria used to evaluate teachers | 4.7 |